Epstein Secrets

to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wri

to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OFM

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wri

N.A. Clle as 261 F.Supp.24 561 ID.VIren Wend. 2003) of time, constitute irreparable harm. De- ng/1y, 309 F.3d at 178, quoting, inter alio, Elrod. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373, 96 S.Ct. 2673, 49 L.Ed2d 547 (1976). IX. Balance of Hann to Plaintiff Venus Harm to Defendants (331 Defendants will suffer• l

ll or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written per- mission of Landlord" (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" sug- gests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in

d to Epstein's request. In this letter, Thomas E. Burns, a representative of OFM, informed Epstein of OF

all or part of the Premises, or assign this lease or permit any other person to use the Premises with the advance written permission of Landlord." (Massey Decl., Exh. B at 4) (emphasis added). Epstein's and Fisher's argument that the word "may" suggests that OFM could approve a sublease or assignment in wr