Epstein Secrets

lishing, by the greater weight of the evidence, that Epstein commenced and continued the judicial proceeding against him without probable cause. See Burns v. GCC Beverages, Inc., 502 So. 2d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 1986); Endacott v. Mt? Hospitality, Inc., 910 So. 2d 915, 923 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("plaintiff mu

een furnished to the attorneys listed on the Service List below on January 8, 2018, through the Court's e-filing portal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1). LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 301 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 [fax] By: /s/ Scott J. Link (FBN 6

Rothstoin's operation of the Point 21 to Frank Burns, 'Frank, you've gone over my 2 scheme. 22 hea

t was your position, which la why there is a frustration hare. Continuances aro discretionary under the law. I have wide discretion. The Rule of Judicial Administration of this state -- and I do my boat to follow [ham. And you have probably heard me at 8 :4Ss make this statoment, at least if not expressly, implled

hink that's it. 25 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you so very SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00180880 i i I 38 1 much. Ms. Burns, on behalf of the state of 2 Florida, anything you'd like to add or 3 advocate? 4 MS. BURNS: If I may, your Honor. 5 THE COURT: Sure. 6 MS.

ontained if it were not dealing with a 16 grand jury proceeding, obviously there's a 17 test that the Court must then use under the 18 Rules of Judicial Administration and it 19 says matters can be sealed but they should 20 be sealed if there's a compelling 21 government interest or if the sealing is 22 impo

EET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J.

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)

EET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Fsq. William J.

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)

EET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J.

ncluding that the non-prosecution and agreement were not properly sealed. The non-parties filed their motions to unseal pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d) (A-10, A-11, A-12). They alleged that Judge Pucillo failed to properly seal the documents under the procedure set forth in that rule (Id.)