Epstein Secrets

a long shot? On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Barry Josephson <I Jeffery, > wrote: Do you want my feedback? The reason Michael Ohoven is wanting Louisiana is most likely because the rebate there is far better than New York, crew rates are less, unions are easier to make deals on the side with, and he m

t, the upside is that it does well at festival circuit and sells for a top price. Obviously I know your longstanding important relationship with The Jarecki's , so let me know how I can be helpful to you. Best, Barry1 From: Jeff Epstein <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 05:56:50 -0800 To:

or (Michael Ohoven) announced to me yesterday that he will not take any partners and will only shoot the film for 10MM all-in (including finance) in Louisiana with 26 shooting days, 3 of them in New York, with me not having much say on anything. He is asking me to sign over all rights now. He has some spec

ox's "Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps." Green ("Casino Royale," "The Golden Compass") is in production on the "Camelot" series for Starz and GK-TV. Jarecki's credits include docu "The Outsider" featuring James Toback. He also co-wrote "The Informers" with Bret Easton Ellis. He's the brother of filmmaker

ooting in gramercy park or the arts club and getting Pacino or the casting director to accept a lower fee or cutting the days to 28 or shooting in Louisiana or getting high Louisiana rebates, etc. There couldn't have been a truth and there couldn't even have been an estimate of it, nor can there be now.

To: Dr. Henry Jarecki[ From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Sat 12/11/2010 5:36:47 PM Subject: Re: the truth to which you referred was merely that you had come to the same co

d befriendeI him. In October 2002, they took AV to dinner and touched his buttocks. Some time later, the defendants invited AV to a football game in Louisiana (across state lines). AV was to share a room with another boy, but, due to a "mix up" was made to share a room with Hitt and Causey. AV was sexuall

ciplines of the humanities in which dissidents might be expected to work. The threat of bodily harm was a constant for most of the applicants, and Jarecki ominously remembered that many of the more than 5000 applicants who were turned down by the institute during the 1930s perished a few years later.