Epstein Secrets

-- she works for a a charity called Tomorrow'➢ Rainbow in Broward County. / she has her hands full right now with the shooting. 10 My daughter Lauren is 41, and oho'➢ a II social director -- rather, an activitie➢ director 12 for a large temple here in Boca Raton. 13 My youngest daughter is Br

if it happened it's relevant to 5 proving that it had happened to your client. 4 The whole point is to prove that it / happened to your client, Donau.* it happened to • other people. And the circumstances, if they can be • similar, that helps as wall. 10 II • You spoke about modus operandi.

2000 09:48 A2 D.OMO.EY 3081467204839V lierbr LAUREN IONINTNER NYSO LLC 457 MADISON AVE NEW YORK NY

uy. Dcmeslc 411 Oil 3rd P.M. iku1oP00. Dorman 419 011 De Pam. COD. Commie 420 BB 3rd Parry. Cow :Neel Fads COO. Dom 421 811318 Pam. Cash COD. Donau 422 811 Raper& Data 423 1311Roapent AaPCCI. Dynastic 429 (000. Bor 2nd eerie. Orman 430 Ave1200. COD. Ber artlPatz. Diuretic 431 Atn,POD. E

United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) 8 United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00077622 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3

Thus, the defendant's claim that she no longer has access to certain evidence is not a proper basis to dismiss the Indictment. See United States v. Donau, 356 F. Supp. 1091, 1094 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) ("A bare allegation that records have been lost or destroyed, which might relate Ig The Government notes t

United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) 8 United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) (tbl.) 5 United States v. Laurenti, 581 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1978) 79 xvi EFTA00039437 United States v. Lawson, 683 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1982) United States v. Leo Sure Chief 438 F.3

Thus, the defendant's claim that she no longer has access to certain evidence is not a proper basis to dismiss the Indictment. See United States v. Donau, 356 F. Supp. 1091, 1094 (S.D.N.Y. 1973) ("A bare allegation that records have been lost or destroyed, which might relate Ig The Government notes t