Epstein Secrets

h is consistent with the leading case of State v. Casey, !7! which considered whether a victim's request

lose the identity of its witnesses before trial. However, the basis for such grants of authority now seems defunct. For instance, in United States v. Armstrong, the Ninth Circuit recognized no authority exists in the federal rules for requiring the government to disclose the names of its witnesses. 74 Still,

disclosure of witness names before trial appears inconsistent with the federal rules. And even if the Ninth Circuit's approach was valid at the time Armstrong was decided, such an approach is no longer valid in light of the CVRA. Rule 57(b) only provides a basis for court authority in the absence of control

n 22 Mich. J.L. & Reform 773 (1989). 50 See United States v. Sells Eng., Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 466 (Burger, C.J., dissenting). 5! See, e.g., State v. Casey, 44 P.3d 756 (Utah 2002), discussed infra notes 163-66 and accompanying text. 32 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(4) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005); see In re Kari Ann

246 150 Cong. Rec. $10,911 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphases added). 247 Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972) (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 (1965)). 248 150 Cong. Rec. $4264 (daily ed. Apr. 22, 2004) (statement of Sen. Kyl) (emphasis added). 249 See 18 U.S.C.

Alun✓ones, Jeremy & Deborah -Lulu Arango, Maile *Redactions for personal contact information Arellano, Victor Arion Joaquin .:. . . ...... Armstrong, Arthur & --- ' I • I I • . ra Hicks rl • • '.I • t WIiiiam Saker Danny !. . l I, ~ " ~ .!. II *Redactions for personal contact i

contact information Vlttoz Martine • • 1 I Von Habsburg, Francesca Wagner David , . .,.." . , .. ,., Waksal, Sam Warner, Ozzie Wasserman, Casey & Laura .. O'\ N *Redactions for personal contact information We_ldenfeldl Lord Weinstein! Bob Westhelmer, Ruth Or. White Victoria • • :