Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06913-06914 06/22/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Susan K. Stirling Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030.06031 05/04/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Espina — Walmart case Attorney/Client

vant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at. Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

ivilege and/or work product 07432-07435 09/25/2009 New addition to the case Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06906-06909 07/17/2009 Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06913-06914 06/22/2009 . Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030-0603

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06913.06914 06/22/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Susan K. Stirling Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030-06031 05/04/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Espina — Walmart case Attorney/Client