Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

K. Stirling Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030.06031 05/04/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Espina — Walmart case Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 05646 07/08/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client meeting Attorney/Client priv

vant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at. Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

and/or work product 06913-06914 06/22/2009 . Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030-06031 05/04/2009 I • Espina — Walmart case Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 05646 07/08/2009 I' Client meeting Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 05573 09/

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

K. Stirling Jane Doe v. Roe Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 06030-06031 05/04/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Espina — Walmart case Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 05646 07/08/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client meeting Attorney/Client priv