Epstein Secrets

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04916.04920 09/11/2009 Elizabeth Villar Bradley Edwards Updates on # of victims, billing amounts, etc. Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calcula

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04916-04920 09/11/2009 Elizabeth Villar Bradley Edwards Updates on # of victims, billing amounts, etc. Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calcula

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

, a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. k) On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Elizabeth Villar, a legal assistant to Rothstein, about Epstein's alleged asset transfers; and I) On September 4 and again on September 9, 2009, Edwards and Fisten

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan

, a partner at RRA who also participated in the Epstein actions, regarding Litigation Strategy. k) On September 11, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Elizabeth Villar, a legal assistant to Rothstein, about Epstein's alleged asset transfers; and I) On September 4 and again on September 9, 2009, Edwards and Fisten

Ponzi scheme, RRA was also engaged in litigation against Epstein in three civil cases. The cases were Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CIV- 80893 ("Jane Doe"), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida; L.M. v. Epstein ("LM"), Case No. 50-2008 CA 028051XXXXMB-AB; and E.W. v. Epstein ("EW" or "Jan