Epstein Secrets

me, we can continue discussions and see whether we are able to reach an agreement or not. Just an idea. Let me know what you think. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Ft Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:56 AM To: Paul Cassell <cassellp_@

4:12 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: image001.png; image002.png I'm wonder if you could work with us on one thing -- both sides gave Judge Brannon a list of dates that would work, but he picked another date -- July 5. That date is awkward for me, because it would require me to rearrange long es

he is on duty. We, of course, do not oppose a motion to reschedule. Please let me know if you need anything from me. Best regards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P. L. 0 O41 Au. Or EFTA00211246

re then. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2016, at 4:23 PM, wrote: Hi Paul — Thank you for your email. July 5th is bad for us, too, but I saw Judge Brannon to sign some search warrants yesterday and, although we didn't talk about this case, he mentioned how full his schedule was. I don't know that he is

me, we can continue discussions and see whether we are able to reach an agreement or not. Just an idea. Let me know what you think. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos Et Lehrman, P.L. Brad Edwards Board Certified Trial Attorney 000000Z From: (USAFLS) Imailto: Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 11:

rchestrating around this many schedules is difficult. Not impossible but maybe not necessary. By that I mean does it make more sense to inform Judge Brannon that we are communicating with one another to see if a resolution is possible without the need for mediator input? If there comes a point where we