Epstein Secrets

der (DE 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to His Requests Filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, C

ler White had in its files and turned over in February 2018 to Epstein's current trial counsel, Link & Rockenbach. The Bankruptcy Movants claim that Fowler White's retention of the disc is a violation of the November 2010 Agreed Order and they seek sanctions against Fowler White and Epstein for that retention.

(D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L ("Fanner"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Fowler White B

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

(D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L ("Fanner"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Fowler White B

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

rder (DE 1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to His Request Filed by Interested Party Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. (hereinafter "Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing"). DE 1194. Movants request sanctions against Fowler White

. Movants request sanctions against Fowler White, a law firm which withdrew from representing any party in this case nearly six years ago. DE 3034. Fowler White's investigation has not revealed how the offending CF ended up in its files since it sent the disk back to Special Master Carney after printing the do

7:6,7 13:13 14:8 26:16 30:18 33:19 44:18 45:11 61:2 81:21 93:23 98:18 99:25 102:2 111.18,19 112:24 114:11 J J 2:5 45:14 Jack 2:8,17 98:13 Jaffe 7:22 10:1,2,3,5 10:6 11:15 14:3,4 37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4

s case is about to begin that they are le have been able to piece together, i0 very clearly Is first reviewing 36 boxes, or over 30 bozos of IS Fowler White's irproper retention of this na aaaaaa 14 files. Hight have bean 32. I think 36 is the 16 after they had been expressly ordered by the 17 ntabor.

7:6,7 13:13 14:8 26:16 30:18 33:19 44:18 45:11 61:2 81:21 93:23 98:18 99:25 102:2 111.18,19 112:24 114:11 J J 2:5 45:14 Jack 2:8,17 98:13 Jaffe 7:22 10:1,2,3,5 10:6 11:15 14:3,4 37:15 38:6,13 57:4 JAMES 2:12 Jane 2:11 22:18 65:9,20 74:14 Jansen 81:21,25 83:3,11,12,19 85:1 88:19 90:4

s case is about to begin that they are le have been able to piece together, i0 very clearly Is first reviewing 36 boxes, or over 30 bozos of IS Fowler White's irproper retention of this na aaaaaa 14 files. Hight have bean 32. I think 36 is the 16 after they had been expressly ordered by the 17 ntabor.

S not finding fault with anything you or way the Searcy, Denney firm, Mr. Edwards, Piffle,' 3 Miss Rockonbach or Mira Campbell did. that's not i Jaffe -- I was going to nay Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the 131200. You've Jana your job. don't want to got his confused with the well- a KR. LINK: I under

K: And I agree with that. The, 12 Lieges or copies of said documents be retained in bankruptcy court reserved that. ghat I'm 13 the memory of Fowler White's copies. And we .4 suggesting to the Court is I don't think it's as le already went through the sanctions. ., clear as Mr. Scarola said. And

er A. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, ■ ("Fanner"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Fowler White Bu

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

(D.E. #1068) and to Compel Jeffrey Epstein to Pay for the Production of All Documents in Response to his Requests filed by Interested Party Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L ("Fanner"), was adequately resolved by agreement of the parties as follows. The law firm of Fowler White B

in any copies of the documents contained on the discs provided to it, nor shall any images or copies of said documents be retained in the memory of Fowler White's copiers. Should it be determined that Fowler White or Epstein retained images or copies of the subject documents on its computer or otherwise, the

information derived from documents or data over which a claim of privilege was asserted by or on behalf of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler PA; Fanner, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.; or Bradley J. Edwards? MR. LINK: I think -- which subpoena duces tecum are you looking at, Jack? Which

of your declaration, Exhibit Number 1, states, "In February 2018, Scott J. Link of Link & Rockenbach, PA, informed me that he had located a disc in Fowler White's files labeled," quote, Epstein Bate Stamp, unquote. Did I read that accurately? A: Correct. Q: That was a communication from Mr. Link, your lawyer