Epstein Secrets

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00071567 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00075450 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00088684 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

at the agency has conducted a thorough search" and (2) give "reasonably detailed explanations why any withheld documents fall within an exemption." Carney v. DOJ, 19 F.3d 807, 812 (2d Cir. 1994). The agency's declaration is "accorded a presumption of good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the ag

eased, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeal. See, e.g., Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D. D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S Dep't ofJustice, II F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D. D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00069319 As a threshold matter, all of the records withheld by FBI pursuant t