Epstein Secrets

at the agency has conducted a thorough search" and (2) give "reasonably detailed explanations why any withheld documents fall within an exemption." Carney v. DOJ, 19 F.3d 807, 812 (2d Cir. 1994). The agency's declaration is "accorded a presumption of good faith," and discovery is "unnecessary if the ag

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The government need only demonstrate a "rat

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, FBI properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). C. The FBI's Application of Exemption 7(A) Was Timely It is well-established law that a

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt

(2d Cir. 2009) 18 Barney v. I.R.S., 618 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1980) 8 Billington v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 301 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Carney v. DO.I, 19 F.3d 807 (2d Cir. 1994) 5 CIA v. Sala, 471 U.S. 159 (1985) 4 Conti v. U.S. Dep'I of Homeland Sec., No. 12 Civ. 5827 (AT), 2014 WL

overnment need only show that "disclosure of particular kinds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The 2 For the records withheld in full by B

hese categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exemption 5 i. Exempt