Epstein Secrets

ver to them solely for purposes of performing the 22 administrative task of Bates stamping and printing out 23 copies, one to be delivered to Judge Carney, serving as 24 Special Master on behalf of the bankruptcy trustee, and a 25 second copy to go to the Farmer Jaffe law firm, so that a 3 (Pages 9 t

he In Re: McClean case, 2 Courts have held, and we've cited them in 2 and countless other 11th Circuit cases, and lower court 3 our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts don't have the inherent 3 cases, that's seeking criminal contempt sanctions, which 4 power to find criminal contempt. 4 I've already discussed

rned over to them solely for purposes of performing the administrative task of Bates stamping and printing out copies, one to be delivered to Judge Carney, serving as Special Master on behalf of the bankruptcy trustee, and a second copy to go to the Farmer Jaffe law firm, so that a OUELLETTE & NIAULD

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 29 provisions of Title 11. Courts have held, and we've cited them in our motion, that Bankruptcy Courts don't have the inherent power to find criminal contempt. Now based on the facts that I just laid out, I don't think there could ever be a basis fo

go. DE 3034. Fowler White's investigation has not revealed how the offending CF ended up in its files since it sent the disk back to Special Master Carney after printing the documents per the Court's order. Notwithstanding the uncertainty regarding how the CD got into Fowler White's files, one thing i

ontempt powers only to Article III judges and that magistrates are not empowered to try criminal proceedings. As a result, the court concluded that Bankruptcy Courts do not have the inherent power to consider criminal contempt sanctions. See also In re Lickman, 288 B.R. 291, 292-93 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2003)(as Art