Epstein Secrets

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

protected from disclosure, this applies when "the manner and circumstances of the various techniques ... [are] not generally known to the public." Coleman v. FBI, 13 F. Supp. 2d 75, 83 (D.D.C. 1998); see also Shapiro v. Dep't of Justice, 249 F. Supp. 3d 502, 507 (D.D.C. 2017) ("Even though the identit

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the