Epstein Secrets

21-05-05/facebook-makes-trump-ban-permanent-or- lifts-does-deplatforrning-even-work> (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make — precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it es

nning-trump-11620255813> (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their po

ew York Post <https://nypost.com/2021/05/05/facebooks-oversight-decision-backing-trump- ban-shows-company-was-out-to-get-him/> (5/5, 7.45M) says that the Oversight Board's decision proves that Facebook "clearly had it in for the former president, using the riot as a pretext to silence him." The Post argues that "Faceb

l affairs and communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The J ns Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high- profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e

The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p

their political power to enforce censorship through social media companies. EFTA00135939 In an editorial, the New York Poe (5/5, 7.45M) says that the Oversight Board's decision proves that Facebook "clearly had it in for the former president, using the riot as a pretext to silence him." The Post argues that "Faceb

communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The Los Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, EFTA00149828 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e

The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p

ats are using their political power to enforce censorship through social media companies. In an editorial, the New York Post (5/5, 7.45M) says that the Oversight Board's decision proves that Facebook "clearly had it in for the former president, using the riot as a pretext to silence him." The Post argues that "Faceb