4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
21-05-05/facebook-makes-trump-ban-permanent-or- lifts-does-deplatforrning-even-work> (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make — precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it es
nning-trump-11620255813> (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their po
tps://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/05/05/federal-judge-vacates-cdcs-nationwide-eviction- moratorium/> (5/5, Al, Swenson, 10.52M) reports that Friedrich wrote, "The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide evic
l affairs and communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The J ns Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high- profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e
The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p
ho alleged that the CDC overstepped its authority by extending the eviction moratorium." The Washing nn Pnst (5/5, Al, Swenson, 10.52M) reports that Friedrich wrote, "The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide evi
communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The Los Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, EFTA00149828 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e
The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p
ho alleged that the CDC overstepped its authority by extending the eviction moratorium." The Washington Post (5/5, Al, Swenson, 10.52M) reports that Friedrich wrote, "The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide evi
nd Mark Warner (D-VA) wrote "to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg asking for a full explanation on why the company
atic senators are pressing Facebook for more answers." Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chris Coons (D-DE) and Mark Warner (D-VA) wrote "to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg asking for a full explanation on why the company terminated the researcher accounts and how they violated the platform's terms of service and compr
p' in order to resurrect a pandemic-related eviction ban despite an indication from the Supreme Court that the measure was unlawful." Politico says Friedrich "made the pointed remark at a hearing on a request by real estate brokers and landlords to block the new policy the Centers for Disease Control and
Entities connected to both Mark Zuckerberg and Friedrich

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Eric Trump
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
William Barr
PERSON
Harry Reid
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Martha Stewart
PERSON
Mitch McConnell
PERSON