Epstein Secrets

21-05-05/facebook-makes-trump-ban-permanent-or- lifts-does-deplatforrning-even-work> (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make — precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it es

nning-trump-11620255813> (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their po

his new blog, Fox News and other forms of bathroom walls — but he won't have the social media megaphone he needs to really sell the lies and hate." Kara Swisher writes in the New York Times <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/05/opinion/trump-facebook- oversight-board.html> (5/5, 20.6M) that Facebook's Oversight

l affairs and communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The J ns Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high- profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e

The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p

his new blog, Fox News and other forms of bathroom walls - but he won't have the social media megaphone he needs to really sell the lies and hate." Kara Swisher writes in the New York Times (5/5, 20.6M) that Facebook's Oversight Board "avoid[ed] a clear decision about Donald Trump's heinous online behavior."

communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The Los Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, EFTA00149828 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e

The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p

his new blog, Fox News and other forms of bathroom walls - but he won't have the social media megaphone he needs to really sell the lies and hate." Kara Swisher writes in the New York Times (5/5, 20.6M) that Facebook's Oversight Board "avoid[ed) a clear decision about Donald Trump's heinous online behavior."