4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
21-05-05/facebook-makes-trump-ban-permanent-or- lifts-does-deplatforrning-even-work> (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make — precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it es
nning-trump-11620255813> (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their po
ssive platform." The Wall Street Journal <https://vvwvv.wsj.com/articles/donald-trumps-facebook-ban-is-upheld-by-oversight-board-11620220252> (5/5, Horwitz, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) reports that the decision could set the stage for how technology companies address political speech in the future,
l affairs and communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The J ns Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high- profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e
The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p
Jackson reported that "if he stays banned, any potential future run would get harder without that massive platform." The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Horwitz, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) reports that the decision could set the stage for how technology companies address political speech in the future,
communication said in a blog post Wednesday." The Los Angeles Times (5/5, Contreras, EFTA00149828 3.37M) reports that "the choice will now be CEO Mark Zuckerberg's to make - precisely the sort of high-profile, politically charged, seemingly lose-lose decision Facebook seemed intent on side-stepping when it e
The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) editorializes that the decision by the Oversight Board opens up the opportunity for Zuckerberg to stand by the principles of free speech and overturn the ban on Trump, arguing that the more dangerous threat is that Democrats are using their p
Jackson reported that "if he stays banned, any potential future run would get harder without that massive platform." The Wall Street Journal (5/5, Horwitz, Subscription Publication, 8.41M) reports that the decision could set the stage for how technology companies address political speech in the future,
09-COVER STORY.01
Mirren, Scarlett Johansson, Isla Fischer and ‘#>owitz Sasha Baron Cohen, Tom Hanks, Sean Penn, Renee Ze
nts its battle cry with one word: relevance. Mark Zuckerberg lands on the cover of Time Magazine as “Person of
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012700 →serious Oscar contender for Best Picture. It gallops off to box office gold. The Social Network now cements its battle cry with one word: relevance. Mark Zuckerberg lands on the cover of Time Magazine as “Person of the Year.” A smart and extensive ad campaign positions the film in the lead. Critics and pundits pr
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012700 →Entities connected to both Mark Zuckerberg and Horwitz

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Barack Obama
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Hillary Clinton
PERSON
Woody Allen
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSON