Epstein Secrets

parties could come to a mutually agreeable date for the deposition. Plaintiff still, nearly three months later, has yet to agree to a date in which Shanks can be deposed, but has instead unilaterally designated September 9th and 10th in Philadelphia as the time and place for Defendants' depositions. D

duction *1 This case arises out of a contract dispute?" The Plaintiff claims that the Defendants contracted with him to paint a family portrait of Abigail Wexner and her three children. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants breached this contract by refusing to pay for the portrait after it was delivere

(Entered: 02/18/2003) 02/27/2003 7 REPLY to Plaintiffs Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, ABIGAIL WEXNER, LESLIE WEXNER, Certificate of Service. (ar, ) (Entered: 02/28/2003) 03/18/2003 8 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR DISMIS

he Plaintiff seeking to set up a meeting between Mrs. Wexner and the Plaintiff in New York City; 2) a fax sen

ecause a substantial part of the events giving rise to this claim occurred in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Ili. pAcTs 8. In early 2000, Shanks was contacted by Maxwell, who represented to Shanks that she was acting on behalf of Epstein and/or the Wexners, to inquire whether Shanks would cc

ne 25, 1985, as amended in certain respects by Amendments No. 1 through 32 thereto, and is filed by Leslie H. Wexner, for and on behalf of himself, Abigail S. Wexner, Wexner Personal Holdings Corporation, Foxcote One, Foxcote Two, Trust 600, the R.H.R.E.I. Trust, and The Family Trust (collectively, the "Purchase

LESLIE WEXNER.Four Forwarded To: Counsel on 10/3/02 (ti, ) (Entered: 10/03/2002) 12/16/2002 2 ORDER THAT JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN ; GHISLAINE MAXWELL ; ABIGAIL WEXNER ; LESLIE WEXNER HAVE UNTIL 12/31/02 TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE PLEAD TO THE COMPLAINT; LAWRENCE J. FOX WILL ACCEPT SERVICE ON BEHALF OF

ays upon exercise of outstanding options held by Mrs. Wexner. The power to vote or direct the disposition of

ife, Abigail, and their four young children, an apparently horrified Wexner returned it to the artist, Nelson Shanks. Wexner's lawyer alleges that Shanks "created an inherently impersonal, inaccurate and disturbing painting." Shanks, 65, is no color-by-numbers hack. He has done portraits of Ronald

o? Limited Brands Chairman (and billionaire) Leslie Wexner has redefined etiquette. After viewing a 6-by-6-foot oil painting of himself, his wife, Abigail, and their four young children, an apparently horrified Wexner returned it to the artist, Nelson Shanks. Wexner's lawyer alleges that Shanks "crea

wife, Abigail, and their four young children, an apparently horrified Wexner returned it to the artist, Nelson Shanks. Wexner's lawyer alleges that Shanks "created an inherently impersonal, inaccurate and disturbing painting." Shanks, 65, is no color-by-numbers hack. He has done portraits of Ronald R

o? Limited Brands Chairman (and billionaire) Leslie Wexner has redefined etiquette. After viewing a 6-by-6-foot oil painting of himself, his wife, Abigail, and their four young children, an apparently horrified Wexner returned it to the artist, Nelson Shanks. Wexner's lawyer alleges that Shanks "create