Epstein Secrets

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

then, yes, the motion to stay does need to be heard. THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Scarola. MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, Jack Scarola, David Vitale from Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and Shipley; and Mr. Phil Burlington of Burlington and Rochenbach, on behalf of Mr. Edwards in this matter. As has bee

nts that these matters are foreclosed as a consequence of prior Kelly proceedings. THE COURT: All right, Mr. Burlington. Welcome. MR. BURLINGTON: Phil Burlington on behalf of Counter-Plaintiff Edwards. We filed a separate motion to strike in response to the summary judgment, based on law of the case. We di