Epstein Secrets

a true and correct copy of this Response was furnished via email this 19th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff B

their very own creation by either attorney-client or work product. If the disc somehow improperly came into the possession of Fowler White and Mr. Ackerman (of which Mr. Cassell has not even the slightest of proof), then the most one could say is that for eight years Fowler White and Mr. Ackerman held

y, no competent lawyer could review the materials that are now sealed and not insist on an in camera review of their contents. Fowler White and Mr. Ackerman's failure to do so makes it much less likely that they knew what was on the disc. There can be no urgency created by the revelation of eight-year-ol

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

at could be the case, who knows? But 2 different if it w➢ shown to me that somehow, some 2 Ile not finding fault with anything you or 3 way the Searcy, Denney firm, Kr. Edwards, Farmer a Hiss ROckonbach or Miss Campbell did. That'➢ not 4 Jaffe -- I was going to say Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the i

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

How that could be the case, Mb knows? But different if it wan shown to no that somehow, soma 2 I'S not finding fault with anything you or way the Searcy, Denney firm, Mr. Edwards, Piffle,' 3 Miss Rockonbach or Mira Campbell did. that's not i Jaffe -- I was going to nay Ron Rothstein, but I 4 the

fashion so that, 25 NR. LINK: He la, yea. And we reached out ' 34 36 , motor one, first and foremen[ once all the cards I Joe Ackerman. Kr. Ackerman. Sorry. We reached . are on the table, the law favors settlement, and it 2 out to Mr. Ackerman. may come tO fruition, and has more often than no

er white. They have no memory of it. *o we, LIA, Mr. $•Carole -- that the Court had a specific interest in and has 23 THE COURT: Excuse 04. LA MX. Ackerman atilt I always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? to bo on the table in a timely fashion so that, 25 NR. LINK