4
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Connected Business (1) View NI Sources (1) Business Summa Name Address Phone PLAN D LLC / (No recent public filings on file) 401 E Booth Rd Searcy, AR 72143-8693 White County LexID Established TIN 0001-1427-9737 2013 (4 Years in Business) MVRs - Prior (0) Aircraft - Prior (0) Exectaive
c Record: 1 OF 3 RECORD(S) Comprehensive Business Report Report Created:6-15-2017 11:52 AM EST I FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY I Copyright 2017 LexisNexis, All rights reserved. Search Terms - company(Plan D, LLC) radius(15) Executives - Current (0) Incorporation/SOS (1) Operations/Sites (1) Sales
Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations? Applying the Crime Victims' Rights Act Before Criminal Charges Are Filed
rts concluded that a victim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections.'°! Yet none of these cases—United States v. Turner,'°? Searcy v. Paletz,'® or Searcy v. Skinner'°*—provide strong support for OLC’s position. Turner is a particularly poor fit. Although OLC’s memorandum characte
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014057 →parallel to the civil forfeiture proceeding. See State v. Lee, 245 P.3d 919, 923-24 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). 232 Haw. Rev. Stat. ANN. § 801D-4(a)(1) (LexisNexis 2007). 733 See id. 234 Id. § 801D-2. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014078 --- PAGE BREAK --- 100 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104 Other states also expressly extend
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014079 →CRIMINAL LAW: CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS DURING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS? APPLYING THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT BEFORE CRIMINAL CHARGES ARE FILED
nd sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603 --- PAGE BREAK --- CRI
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603 →that a victim of uncharged conduct should not be afforded statutory protections. !°! Yet none of these cases - United States v. 10 104 Turner, !9? Searcy v. Paletz, !°3 or Searcy v. Skinner - provide strong support for OLC's position. Turner is a particularly 9 See 42 U.S.C. § 10607(c). % Td. § 10607(
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017616 →ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
nd sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635 --- PAGE BREAK --- ART
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635 →ainst individuals who have not been convicted of a crime." Jn re W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005) (emphasis added); accord Searcy v. Skinner, No. 6:06-1418-GRA-WMC, 2006 WL 1677177, at 2 (D.S.C. June 16, 2006). Like the constitutional amendment it was patterned on, the CVRA exte
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017708 →Entities connected to both Searcy and LexisNexis

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONScott Rothstein
PERSONMartindale-Hubbell
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONLeon Black
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Jacksonville
LOCATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON