Epstein Secrets

0 XXXXMB AG I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this Ze iday of August, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409. .).2a 01-0 Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar

ll v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). These cases provide the binding precedent in this area of law. All actions occurring during the

0 XXXXMB AO 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this ac day of August, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, E., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409. 2.-O Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 23595

ell v. US. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1994), Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007), and Wolfe v. Foreman, 38 Fla. L. Weekly D1540 (July 17, 2013). These cases provide the binding precedent in this area of law. All actions occurring during the

then, yes, the motion to stay does need to be heard. THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Scarola. MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, Jack Scarola, David Vitale from Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and Shipley; and Mr. Phil Burlington of Burlington and Rochenbach, on behalf of Mr. Edwards in this matter. As has bee

with the transcript can be understood for not remembering. But Epstein moved for summary judgment on three grounds: litigation privilege that the Wolfe case compelled with, and also that we were unable to prove two elements of the malicious prosecution claim. One of them was lack of probable caus