Epstein Secrets

911 do not voted manse domes lithe markt vat* of year remanent, leacher as a mule a matt inowenent. nom PrilalptCY Or Otbef, a ) Mae Wormaon s salt Stern request Yee may obtan rim note ton *out SIC, ndudng the SFC Brother* by codeine SPC at 202-37143300a by mang tie SP( webne arrow sec oril Dividew

t also does not include cash I:.m:fends that were rat *Infested Cost PrKe per Share basis (S) on May 30(4) value on unrealized Rain iniemment Herring May 30 (3) gain or loss (3) return (3) Period 190.000 168.060 31,931 40 31,931.40 120.430 22,881.70 -9,04970 -9.04970 LT 0070300305631

g the grant of summary judgment.”); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under R

uire amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially advance the resolution of the litigation on the merits. See Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1024 (9th Cir. 1989). A. Rule 21 Motion Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s first attempt to join in this proceedi

quire amendment where the addition of parties with duplicative claims will not materially advance the resolution of the litigation on the merits. See Herring v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 894 F.2d 1020, 1024 (9th Cir. 1989). A. Rule 21 Motion Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s first attempt to join in this proceedin

ying amendment where “addition of more plaintiffs .. . would not have affected the issues underlying the grant of summary judgment.”’); cf. Arthur v. Stern, 2008 WL 2620116, at *7 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Under Rule 15, “courts have held that leave to amend to assert a claim already at issue in [another lawsuit