Epstein Secrets

re assertion of inability.' Id. (quoting Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co., 785 F.2d 970,984 (11th Cir. 1986)).

urt orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process. The Court has jurisdiction here because the Court retained jurisdiction in the Agreed Order [D.E. 1194], and this alleged discovery violation is a core proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 157 ("Core proceedings include, but are not limited to (A) matter

.'" Burnes 291 F.3d at 1286 (citations omitted); Ryan Operations G.P. v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co., 81

ined that, after the NPA was signed in September 2007, four victims were contacted and the provision for a federal restitution remedy was discussed. D.E. 14,1 8. When Epstein's attorneys learned of this, they complained that the Government was incentivizing the victims to overstate their involvement

d." Burnes 291 F.3d at 1286 (citations omitted); Ryan Operations G.P. v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co., 81

ined that, after the NPA was signed in September 2007, four victims were contacted and the provision for a federal restitution remedy was discussed. D.E. 14,1 8. When Epstein's attorneys learned of this, they complained that the Government was incentivizing the victims to overstate their involvement