4
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
ad committed any federal crimes, and entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, which was an exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. Nixon v. United States, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)("the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a c
V-MARRAMOHNSON EFTA00208059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 57-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04107/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to
ad committed any federal crimes, and entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, which was an exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. Nixon v. United States, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974)("the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a c
s been filed." 23 EFTA00078857 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 24 of 54 In Sieverding v. United States Dep't of Justice, 693 F. Supp. 2d 93 (D.D.C. 2010), the district court discussed a series of claims brought by the Sieverdings, a husband and wife so well known to
ARTICLE: Treating Crime Victims Fairly: Integrating Victims into the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
is reasonable in a particular case) [hereinafter Dep't of Justice, Attorney General Guidelines]; see also U.S. Dep'
e proposal and accompanying note, I am concerned that the limits on subpoenas found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure courts consistently apply Nixon's substantive and procedural standards to victim-related subpoenas,
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017665 →ARTICLE: Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: Proposed Amendments in Light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act
istration of Justice and the Enforcement of Laws: Dep't of Justice Oversight Hearing Before the S. Judiciary Comm.,
quash subpoena directed to kidnapping victim's father for lack of materiality). 93 See Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(Q). °4 See generally United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 689 (1974). 95 See id. at 699. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017739 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 26 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *879
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740 →Entities connected to both Cynthia Nixon and Dep't of Justice

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Richard Nixon
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Eric Trump
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
New York
LOCATION