Epstein Secrets

-other-issues/2020/07/23/ec1585a4-cd01-11ea-bc6a- 68411328d9093_stoty.html> (7/23, Nakamura, Morello, 14.2M) reports Pompeo's address Thursday at the Nixon Presidential Library comes as the Administration is "moving to expand on [President Trump's] rhetorical blasts and marshal a broader campaign to pu

ttps://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/07/23/exclusive-sen-tom-cotton-presses-doj-to-investigate- google-over-potential-antitrust-violations/> (7/23, Boyle, 673K) reports Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) is pushing the Justice Department "to probe whether search giant Google is in violation of antitrust laws on a

14.2M) reports Pompeo's address Thursday at the Nixon Presidential Library comes as the Administration

raudsters are master manipulators and have high rates of recidivism; he said." Cotton Urges Barr To Launch Google Antitrust Probe. Breitbart (7/23, Boyle, 673K) reports Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) is pushing the Justice Department "to probe whether search giant Google is in violation of antitrust laws on a

grace, but in using the power of his office to keep his friend and adviser Roger J. Stone Jr. out of prison he has now crossed a line that even Mr. Nixon in the depths of Watergate dared not cross." According to Baker, "Trump indulged his own sense of grievance over precedent to reward an ally who ke

n led by the Internal Revenue Service and the FBI." North Carolina Man Sentenced For Running Ponzi Scheme. The Asheville (NC) Citizen-Times (7/10, Boyle, 138K) reports, "Saying Ponzi schemer Hal Brown appeared to be 'a con man to his soul,' a federal judge on July 9 sentenced the Biltmore Park resid

ule of Criminal Procedure 17(c)(2) permits the court to quash a subpoena "if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive." Under United States v. Nixon, the party requesting the subpoena has the burden of showing "(1) that the documents are evidentiary and relevant; (2) that they are not otherwise

is improper because investigative files often contain many documents that arc inadmissible on hearsay or other grounds. See. e.g., United States v. Boyle, No. 08 CR 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (McMahon, J.) (quashing subpoena for investigative file as overbroad because al

erns nonparty subpoenas in criminal proceedings. Rule 17(c) "was not intended to provide a means of discovery for criminal cases." United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 698 (1974); see also, e.g., United States v. Barnes, 560 F. App'x 36, 39 (2d Cir. 2014) ("Rule 17 subpoenas are properly used to obta

n's requirement that subpoenaed materials must not be otherwise procurable in advance of trial by the exercise of due diligence."); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (quashing a 17(c) subpoena where it was "likely that many of the documents tha

pen by the end of this year." The Hill (11/14, Lillis, 2.98M) says Pebsi "accused Trump of committing offenses more severe than those of President Nixon, who resigned in 1974 amid an impeachment proceeding." She said, °What President Trump has done on the record — in terms of ... [asking] a foreign

besieged ally as he would be about a midtown real estate deal.' Breitbart: Democrats Suffered "Clear Political Loss" Wednesday. Breitbart (11/13, Boyle, 673K) reports Wednesday's hearing Vas widely panned as the two career diplomats who testified failed to offer clear allegations of wrongdoing aga

14.2M) reports Pompeo's address Thursday at the Nixon Presidential Library comes as the Administration

raudsters are master manipulators and have high rates of recidivism; he said." Cotton Urges Barr To Launch Google Antitrust Probe. Breitbart (7/23, Boyle, 673K) reports Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) is pushing the Justice Department "to probe whether search giant Google is in violation of antitrust laws on a

bly to delay the trial; and (4) that the application is made in good faith and is not intended as a general "fishing expedition." United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 (1974) (footnote omitted); see United States v. Skelos, 988 F.3d 645, 661 (2d Cir. 2021) (affirming a decision to quash subpo

g motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas and permitting ex parte applications "if the movant can articulate a reason why it should be"); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (requiring noticed motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas to "assur[e] that such subp

bly to delay the trial; and (4) that the application is made in good faith and is not intended as a general "fishing expedition." United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 699-700 (1974) (footnote omitted); see United States v. Skelos, 988 F.3d 645, 661 (2d Cir. 2021) (affirming a decision to quash subpo

g motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas and permitting ex parte applications "if the movant can articulate a reason why it should be"); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523 (CM), 2009 WL 484436, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 24, 2009) (requiring noticed motions for Rule 17(c) subpoenas to "assur[e] that such subp