Epstein Secrets

29 IN I Court 9:54 RA GN GS PRE REM 10:18 79 92 88 794 793 792 791 790 0 789 788 787 74379-053 09873-014 76140-054 11381-171 Nixon 78291-061 Poole HA PRE REM Vtiz &.•:" Downer Larkin EN IN ZA GN PRE REM I 1 I11.0 REM 84 McAfee HLD REM HLD REM 84 76 786 78 7

-054 Torres KN HLD REM 8:52 88 761 86198-054 Perez GS HLD REM 8:52 69 760 85976-054 I Martinez Ks Hosp 9:12 I 141 759 84831-054 Gupta ES Furl Iran 9:25 81 758 85976-054 Martinez Hosp KS tl 12:18 142 759 i EFTA00056086 DATE: SUNDAY, AUGUST 4, 2019. Page: 1 METROPOL

d 8:30 AM AM Census Count Conducted 8:45 AM -8 I/M Diaz #76314-054, Downer #74379-053, Fernandez #85498-054, Larkin #09873-014, Mcafee #76140-054, Nixon #11381-171, Poole #78291-061, Torres 486612-054 788 76/5 8:54 AM Body Alarm Testing Complete 9:00 AM I/M Cherry #76218-054 out to L-Hosp w/bop st

ted. 8:30 AM AM Census count 8:31 AM Body Alarm Testing Complete. 11:00 AM Mainline feeding in progress. 11:17 PM -4 HLD REMOVE: Diaz #78018-054, Gupta 054, Torres #85896-054 #84831-054, #86198- 759 76/5 11:35 AM 4 I/M Placed in SHU Cooper #92299-054, Ferrer #79793-054, Dockery #60685-050, Mara

120 (1946), quoted in 1 Charles Alan Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal § 32, at 30 n.1 (3d ed. 1999). 38 See, e.g., United States v. Gupta, 363 F.3d 11691174 (11th Cir. 2004); United States v. Navarro, 169 F.3d 228, 237 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Price, 13 F.3d 711, 723 (3d Cir. 1

e proposal and accompanying note, I am concerned that the limits on subpoenas found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure courts consistently apply Nixon's substantive and procedural standards to victim-related subpoenas,