Epstein Secrets

R,FRANKLYN P LAVERTY,ANNE M GRIFFIS,NIXON MARCUS,JEFFREY A SUMMERS,RUTH A

MILIDRAG,GEORGE CELEDINAS,KIM TURNER,SUE GRANT,HELEN K SMITH,CONSTANCE

heard orally at sentencing), and United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (noting

e proposal and accompanying note, I am concerned that the limits on subpoenas found in the United States Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Nixon 734 might be vitiated by a broad rule. To ensure courts consistently apply Nixon's substantive and procedural standards to victim-related subpoenas,

rged conduct under the CVRA. See United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 327 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (conclu

quash subpoena directed to kidnapping victim's father for lack of materiality). 93 See Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(Q). °4 See generally United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 689 (1974). 95 See id. at 699. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017739 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 26 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *879