Epstein Secrets

rt for the Middle District of Tennessee, John T. Nixon, J., 568 F.Supp. 161, denied the law firm's sum-

S. 980, 102 SAX 1297, 71 LEd.2d 639 (1982), cert. de- nied sub nom. Ramsey I. Donovan, 455 U.S. 940, 102 S.Ct. 1432, 71 LEd.2d 651 (1982); Wirtz'. Fowler, 372 F.2d 315 (5th Cir.1966), overruled in part, Price I. Wirtz, 412 F.2d 647 (5th Cir.1969) (en Banc) ; Donovan'. Master Printers Asso- ciation,

1969) (en bane), the court stated that it was not required to determine the scope of § 204. yet it proceeded to do just that. 372 F.2d at 332. The Fowler court found that § 204 did not prevent the disclosure of any information required un- der § 203. The court opined that in order to be meaningful, a

ck centuries—that "the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case." 1/ United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693, 94 S.Ct. 3090, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974) (citing Confiscation Cases, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 454, 19 L.Ed. 196 (1869)). 23 *1217 We bel

ack, Black Srebnick Komspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL; (3) Gerald B. Lefcourt, Law Office of Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C., New York, NY (4) Lilly Ann Sanchez, Fowler White Burnett, Miami, FL; (5) Jack A. Goldberger, Goldberger & Weiss, West Palm Beach, FL; and (6) Joe D. Whitley, Alston & Bird, Washington D.C.;

ad committed any federal crimes, and entered into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, which was an exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. Nixon' United States, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (I 974)("the Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a ca

1) 820-8711 Fax: (561) 820-8777 E-mail: ann.marie,c,villafana@usdoLaov Attorney for the Government Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Joseph Ackerman, Jr. Fowler White Burnett PA 777 S. Flagler Drive, West Tower, Suite 901 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Criminal Defense Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein (courtesy cop