Epstein Secrets

rect. 21 Q. Do you remember when Mr. Epstein asked 22 where you went to school? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. And you told Mr. Epstein you went to 25 Wellington, right? Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 6701716 EFTA00234286 Case 9:08-

ether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the pl

rect. 21 O. Do you remember when Mr. Epstein asked 22 where you went to school? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. And you told Mr. Epstein you went to 25 Wellington, right? Ph. 561.682.0905 - Fax. 561.682.1771 1655 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 500 - West Palm Beach, FL 33401 63 of 316 EFTA00180469 Case 9:0

ether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the pl

that I was conducting an investigation on Jeffrey Epstein and felt she may have information " o the investigation. Ms identified and resides in Wellington, Florida. She herself as advised approximately a year lire was brought to Epstein's house to provide a massage for money. stated she ded to make

ether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the pl

was conducting an investigation on Jeffrey Epstein and felt she may have information ertainiiilio the investigation. Ms identified and resides in Wellington, Florida. She herself as advised approximately a year aiiiihe was brought to Epstein's house to provide a massage for money. stated she needed to

ether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law, not a question of fact. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Steadman, 968 So. 2d 592, 595 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (citations omitted). In this case, without reaching the question of "outrage," the pl