Epstein Secrets

eanwhile, Geoff Bennett said on NBC Nightly NewsVi (7/3, story 4, 1:41, Melvin, 5.85M) that the announcement of the review "comes just one day after FedEx, the team's most prominent sponsor, asked the team to change its name. FedEx owns the naming rights to where the team plays in Maryland. Also on Th

, 5.85M) that the announcement of the review "comes just one day after FedEx, the team's most prominent sponsor, asked the team to change its name. FedEx owns the naming rights to where the team plays in Maryland. Also on Thursday, Nike appeared to remove the team's products from its website." On the

give testimony, which, is my understanding, he has refused to give. Someone who has nothing to hide would not be refusing to cooperate." CNN (7/2, Hayes, 83.16M) reports, "Audrey Strauss, acting US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, explained the process that led to Maxwell's arrest: 'an

ttorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel for William Riley and Riley Kiraly, via Federal Express. This document was not filed using CM/ECF because it is being filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Sub

ersons protected by a constitutional, common-law or statutory privilege, . . . is particularly applicable to grand jury proceedings." Branzburg v. Hayes , 408 U.S. 665, 688 (1972) (citations omitted). In R. Enterprises , the Supreme Court held that subpoenas cannot be quashed on the basis of irreleva

0• FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2211• PH. 954.356.0011 • FAX 954.356.0022 Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Email: [email protected] February 26, 2015 Via Federal Express Federal Bureau of Investigation Attn: FM/PA Request Record/Information Dissemination Section 170 Marcel Drive Winchester, VA 22602-4843 Federal

t until every available clue has been run down and all witnesses examined in every proper way to find if a crime has been committed.' Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 701, 92 S.Q. 2646, 2667, 33 L.Ed.2d 626 (1972) (quoting United Sixes v. •Stone, 429 F.2d 138, 140 (24 Cir.1970)); In re Grand Jury