Epstein Secrets

thru P-001056 File folder entitled "Notes from Fed Ex Records" containing handwritten and typed attorney (Villafaila) notes and screen shots of FedEx subpoena response electronic file Work Product 6(e) Contains information subject to investigative privilege. Also contains information subject

53 Thru P-003555B Description FBI Reports of March 2008 interviews of additional witness/victim located in New York Printout of filenames from Federal Express subpoena response with Attorney notations Privilege(s) Asserted Work product 6(e) Contains information and documents subject to investigative

(9th Cir. 1977), but rather "must issue the writ whenever we find that the district court's order reflects an abuse of discretion or legal error." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court, 435 F.3d 1011, 1017 (9th Cir. 2006). Here, the district court did not abuse its discretion or commit a legal error in denying

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this day of June, 2009, to: JUDITH STEVENSON ARCO U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District State Attorney's Office-West Palm Beach 500 South Au

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Clr. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpr

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this 30,1a... day of June, 2009, to: U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. B

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cat, 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpre

the appendix to his emergency petition and motion for review, under seal. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing has been sent by email and Federal Express this 3oM.. day of June, 2009, to: U.S. Attorney's Office-Southern District 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLI

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for CD. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpre