Epstein Secrets

re are two significant problems with that reliance. irst there is no mention of material admissions made UMduring her interview, as well as on her MySpace webpage (discovered by defense investigators and turned over to the State Attorney). A copy of the webpage is annexed at Tab 5. Second, all but omi

was omitted from the Police Report or the Probable Cause Affidavit. • !lies on her Victoria's Secret Job Application. Addition mmtion on Hall's MySpace webpagc casts further doubt on her credibility. For example, she boasts to having engaged in a fraudulent scheme to get hired by Victoria's Secret,

rn District of Florida February 1, 2007 Page 13 2. Polygraph Examination a rt. On May 2, 2006, Epstein submitted to a polygraph examination by Slattery, a highly respected polygraph examiner who is regularly used by the State Attorney. The examination was done at a time when we were told that the s

are two significant problems w' that reliance. First there is no mention of material admissions made by MI during her interview, as well as on her MySpace webpage (discovered by defense investigators and turned over to the State Attorney). A copy of the webpage is annexed at Tab 5. Second, all but omi

hern District of Florida February 1, 2007 Page 13 2. Polygraph Examination and On May 2, 2006, Epstein submitted to a polygraph examination by Slattery, a highly respected polygraph examiner who is regularly used by the State Attorney. The examination was done at a time when we were told that the s

Confessional •••", , Brand New Taki Back Sunday, My Chemical Romance Lt Fall Out Boy Operation Ivy what being olive is all about. :) Pimp MySpace Who I'd like to meet: The people I had on here before: Bob Marley, Marilyn Monroe. I would still like to meet ther thinking,... this week I'd lik

March 20 regarding an Administrative Investigation by the DEA), and United States of America vs. Wyatt 0. (case number 2:03-cr-65-FtM-29SPC). Mr. Slattery also testified as an expert in the case of United States Shamico Peters, et al (United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, case nu