Epstein Secrets

tors influencing CSA disclosure have served the field well but are no longer current. Important contributions on CSA disclosures include Paine and Hansen's (2002) original review covering the liter- ature largely from the premillennium era, followed by London, Bruck, Ceci, and Shuman's (2005) subseque

f adults reporting never having had a sexual abuse complaint filed with investigative authorities as a child or an adolescent (i.e., Hunter, 20 II; Gagnier & Collin-Vezina, 2016; Sorsoli, Kia-Keating, & Grossman, 2008; Ungar et al., 20096). With children and youth under the ages of 18 distinct patterns emerged. First

tors influencing CSA disclosure have served the field well but are no longer current. Important contributions on CSA disclosures include Paine and Hansen's (2002) original review covering the liter- ature largely from the premillennium era, followed by London, Bruck, Ceci, and Shuman's (2005) subseque

of adults reporting never having had a sexual abuse complaint filed with investigative authorities as a child or an adolescent (i.e., Hunter, 2011; Gagnier & Collin-Vezina, 2016; Sorsoli, Kia-Keating, & Grossman, 2008; Ungar et al., 20096). With children and youth under the ages of 18 distinct patterns emerged. First

tors influencing CSA disclosure have served the field well but are no longer current. Important contributions on CSA disclosures include Paine and Hansen's (2002) original review covering the liter- ature largely from the premillennium era, followed by London, Bruck, Ceci, and Shuman's (2005) subseque

focused on CSA disclosures with male victims, since males have been an under- studied population (Alaggia, 2005; Easton, 2013; Easton et al., 2014; Gagnier & Collin-Vezina, 2016). Most investigations that sampled both sexes show females outweighing male parti- cipants. Although women are at double the risk of being sub