Epstein Secrets

authority to review a grand jury subpoena for reasonableness. See, e.g., United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 300-01 (1991). While the Supreme •Court has held that grand jury subpoenas are presumed reasonable, that presumption may be overcome and a subpoena quashed where, as here, "there is no re

span & Stumpf 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131.• Phone: 30S-37f-642i • Fax 305-358006 • vomv.Royalackcom EFTA01713182 Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). In short, the investigator in turn stands in the shoes oflis client. See Fisher, 425 U.S. at 404. Since producti

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

ns at issue, each of these categories and subcategories of documents could improperly influence witnesses and jurors. Under the approach ratified by the Supreme Court in Robbins Tire, BOP properly withheld these records under Exemption 7(A). B. BOP Properly Withheld Records and Information Pursuant to FOIA Exempti

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

s will produce information relevant to the, general subject of the grand jury's investigation". R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. at 301. Normally, as the Supreme Court noted in R. Enterprises, Inc., recipients of a grand jury subpoena have little or no knowledge of the crime the grand jury is investigating and will

also Uni 16 Black. Srebnick. Komspan 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33B1. Phone: • Fat • vmm.RoyBlackcom EFTA00179005 Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). In short, the investigator in turn stands in the shoes of his client. See Fisher, 425 U.S. at 404. Since product