5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
8 / 5
Mentions
atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal
erson ..."). § 2423(b) is not such a statute. Federal court decisions watering down the "for the purpose of " requi ment fly in the face of the two Suprems Court decisions addressing that element. See Hansen'. Huff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934); Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369 (1944). Santos and Cuellar speak l
diction is necessary. See Tab 11, November 9, 2007 Letter from Justice Department Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski to the House Committee on the Judiciary, p. 8-9. 3 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001672 EFTA00209851 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Summon of the Law We have reviewed every repor
if the case reaches the higher legal standard of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, instead of the standard of probable cause. The one-page ruling by the Idaho Supreme Court did not provide any reasoning for their denial of Kohberger's attorney's filed appeal, and the matter was closed. The article noted that the suspect
ing to the article, this follows a 2017 trial where jurors were uncertain if the gifts and favors he received were illegal or typical of friendship. The Supreme Court's 2016 decision, which narrowed the definition of corruption by requiring a specific quid pro quo for conviction, has made prosecuting such cases cha
ng jobs • 5:50 PM: The President participates in a campaign event Vice President Harris • No events scheduled. US Senate • A joint hearing with the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs to examine the legislative presentation of The American Legion and multiple veterans service organizations: JWV TAPS NCHV MOAA
if the case reaches the higher legal standard of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, instead of the standard of probable cause. The one-page ruling by the Idaho Supreme Court did not provide any reasoning for their denial of Kohberger's attorney's filed appeal, and the matter was closed. The article noted that the suspect
ing to the article, this follows a 2017 trial where jurors were uncertain if the gifts and favors he received were illegal or typical of friendship. The Supreme Court's 2016 decision, which narrowed the definition of corruption by requiring a specific quid pro quo for conviction, has made prosecuting such cases cha
ng jobs • 5:50 PM: The President participates in a campaign event Vice President Harris • No events scheduled. US Senate • A joint hearing with the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs to examine the legislative presentation of The American Legion and multiple veterans service organizations: JWV TAPS NCHV MOAA
ions—a description used by CEOS itself—it cannot be shown that Mr. Epstein violated any of the three federal statutes identified by prosecutors. As the Supreme Court's recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar make clear, federal law may not be stretched in that manner, and the current federal investigation relies, as
diction is necessary. See Tab 11, November 9, 2007 Letter from Justice Department Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski to the House Committee on the Judiciary, p. 8-9. 3 EFTA00210076 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Summary of the Law We have reviewed every reported case under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591,
atement reveals how inapposite a federal prosecution is to the facts in this case. Importantly, we note that the CEOS review was conducted prior to the Supreme Court's very recent decisions in Santos and Cuellar, which we believe—illuminating as they do the Court's interpretive methodology when it comes to federal
hat Federal jurisdiction is necessary. See Tab 11, November 9, 2007 Letter from Justice Department Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General to the House Committee on the Judiciary, p. 8-9. 3 3505-019 Page 49 of 63 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003321 EFTA00157703
Entities connected to both Supreme Court and the House Committee

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Joe Biden
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Bill Clinton
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Barry Diller
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Stephen Hawking
PERSON