Epstein Secrets

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

ial judge said he really had no choice and had to follow this absolutely binding case-law. Of course the district courts of appeal are also bound by the Supreme Courts two decisions Levin and Echevarria. My approach would be to try and keep this brief relatively simple and to simply say that the Supreme Court has

s on it from your assistant until Friday, June 13th. Obviously that brief is Important because you expect a very similar brief by the same attorney (Phil Burlington) in this Epstein case. I would charge $400 per hour with a 55,000 deposit to handle this appeal In the Fourth District Court of Appeal. I would bi

ief it. It wasn't properly presented. And that would have put me in an odd position, because that had been my position. But also, when it went to the Supreme Court and it was a tagalong case after Fischer was -- the Fischer opinion was issued and they issued an order saying, Is there any reason for us to revi

nts that these matters are foreclosed as a consequence of prior Kelly proceedings. THE COURT: All right, Mr. Burlington. Welcome. MR. BURLINGTON: Phil Burlington on behalf of Counter-Plaintiff Edwards. We filed a separate motion to strike in response to the summary judgment, based on law of the case. We di