Epstein Secrets

. vs. Henry, 839 So2d. 702 at Note 4, 18 Third DCA opinion in 2000, both of which both 19 Judge Cope and the panel in the SCI case note that 20 the Supreme Court's citation in Levin to Wright 21 vs. Yurko, which I cited in the memorandum, which 22 was a Fifth DCA decision back in 1984, implicitly 23 recogn

OURT: Off the record for one second. 21 MR. KING: Yes. 22 (Discussion off the record.) 23 MR. RING: And I cited the Taylor case, 24 which was a Supreme Court of Idaho decision, which 25 discusses that issue and which shows that for www.phippsreporting.com 888 811-3408 EFTA00606540 32 1 those very

8:12 51:2 trouble (1) United (1) (2) weaken (1) times (2) 51:4 3:17 6:24 7:13 37:5 20:25 32:17 troubled (1) unrelated (3) vis-a-vis (1) WEISS (1) timing (1) 49:13 18:21 19:20 44:23 2:8 15:22 true (2) 22:14 volumes (1) Welcome (1) Title (1) 37:15 62:11 untrue (3) 35:3 3:4 39:

. vs. Henry, 839 So2d. 702 at Note 4, 18 Third DCA opinion in 2000, both of which both 19 Judge Cope and the panel in the SCI case note that 20 the Supreme Court's citation in Levin to Wright 21 vs. Yurko, which I cited in the memorandum, which 22 was a Fifth DCA decision back in 1984, implicitly 23 24 25

OURT: Off the record for one second. 21 MR. KING: Yes. 22 (Discussion off the record.) 23 MR. KING: And I cited the Taylor case, 24 which was a Supreme Court of Idaho decision, which 25 discusses that issue and which shows that for www.phippereporting.com 888 811-3408 001241 EFTA00613538 32 1 tho

trouble (1) United (1) Virginia (2) weaken (1) times (2) 51:4 3:17 6:24 7:13 37:5 20:25 32:17 troubled (1) unrelated (3) vis-a-vis (1) WEISS (1) timing (1) 49:13 18:21 19:20 44:23 2:8 15:22 true (2) 22:14 volumes (1) ' Welcome (1) Tide (1) 37:15 62:11 untrue (3) 35:3 3:4 39

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

osed would net be permitted CO be used at. 25 For Jeffrey Epstein: 17 trial. You nada it clear that catchall listings 16 ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER a WEISS. P.A. e 1400 Iv would be unacceptable, that specific individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER,

R. SCAROLA: Your Honor, the next issue It So based upon those two very fundUnantal IS before the Court relates co the plaintiff's II principles, the U.S. Supreme Court recognition, the 19 entitlement to an adverse inference instruction 10 Fifth Anentrient protections do not apply in the 20 arising out of each

sed would net be penn/Lted CO be used at. 25 For Jeffrey Epstein: 17 trial. You rude it clear that catchall listings 16 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER a WEISS, P.A. 1ca would be unacceptable; that specific Individual 17 lo exhibits needed to be listed. I'n sure your Honor By JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIR