Epstein Secrets

ecords, which the Court held "must remain inviolate." Id. at 17. By its terms, Rule 2.420 does not apply to criminal cases; however, later this year the Supreme Court will consider amendments to the rule that essentially seek to apply the standards applicable in civil cases to criminal ones. See In re Amendments t

fact, the U.S. Attorney's Office has taken no position on this matter throughout the lower court proceedings and specifically informed counsel for E.W. that it had no position (A-18 at p. 7,11. 10-14.) At that hearing, the Court found that the proper procedures to initially seal the records were not

Inc. d/b/a The Palm Beach Post ("the Post") its attorneys' fees and costs in responding to this petition. JURISDICTION The Post adopts Respondent E.W.'s statement concerning jurisdiction. Insofar as this Court finds jurisdiction, the Post requests that this Court expedite its consideration of this

ecords, which the Court held "must remain inviolate." Id. at 17. By its terms, Rule 2.420 does not apply to criminal cases; however, later this year the Supreme Court will consider amendments to the rule that essentially seek to apply the standards applicable in civil cases to criminal ones. See In re Amendments t

for respondent, State of Florida) B.B. (non-party intervener) William J. Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler (counsel for non-party intervener, E.W.) Honorable Jeffrey J. Colbath (circuit court judge) Barbara J. Compiani of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petiti

fact, the U.S. Attorney's Office has taken no position on this matter throughout the lower court proceedings and specifically informed counsel for E.W. that it had no position (A-18 at p. 7,11. 10-14.) At that hearing, the Court found that the proper procedures to initially seal the records were not

ds. THE COURT: Okay,. Thank you,- Ma'am.- Ms. Boyagian, back to you. MS. BOYAGIAN: Your Honor, I'd like to note that in the Butterworth case in which the Supreme Court limited the application 905.27 by saying that a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE CO

a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE COURT: Say that again, please. MS. BOYAGIAN; In the Supreme Court Case, the Butterworth case', in which the Supreme Court ruled that 905.27 can't restrict a Grand Jury witness from revealing her own testimony, that would

h to do so today. "It.is against public policy for these documents to be have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has a right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former CircuitJudge Bill Berger, now in private practice-and representing one ofthe women. The P

stantive filings in this case until June 2017, after the Supreme Court declined jurisdiction. Defendant noticed this matter for trial shortly before the Supreme Court's decision and, in July 2017, the Court entered its trial order, special setting a ten-day trial less than five months away. INTRODUCTION The trial

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT

onor of having been selected by the 10 chief justice of the Florida Supremo Court to fulfill II 12 13 14 any responsibilities on behalf of the Supremo Court of Florida? A Yes. The position of chief justice rotates among the justices in the court. And at the time the IS chief justice of the Florida S

S to strike. 14 THE MITNESS: Ho. Is BY MR. SCAROLA: IS Q If Jeffrey Epstein alleges in this 19 complaint against Bradley Edwards that III., E.W. or 24 Jane Doe voluntarily consented to their sexual 21 molestation, could Jeffrey Epstein have possibly made 22 that claim on the basis of any

13 — considerably earlier than Republicans wanted — saying the date pres- ents a "fair and adequate" schedule in line with the timeline for past Supreme Court nominees. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called the Demo- crats tactics "heavy-hand- ed" and urged them to reconsider the schedule. President Obama

th to do so today. "It is against public policy for these documents to have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has the right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, now in private practice and representing one of the women.

this malicious prosecution case, read questions to the jury that my client took the Fifth Amendment to and draw a negative inference therefrom. The US Supreme Court in Baxter -- that's the case -- that's the Fifth Amendment case -- it says, "It's key that there's independent evidence existing of the fact to wh

2874 65 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 to interrogatories in the state court matters, E.W. and L.M., and listed additional high-profile witnesses that would allegedly be called at trial, including, but not limited to:" And then various

RGER: All right. And, also, I don't think the Court -- I think the Court needs to deal with this immediately, expeditiously. This is a matter that the supreme court has placed incredible scrutiny over. And the Rule that we art traveling under -- we're not only traveling under a Rule of Judicial Administration t

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no