Epstein Secrets

including objectors, i f any, has a right to appeal to, or seek reconsideration in, the California Court ofAppeal, the California Supreme Court, or the U.S. Supreme Court or; to the extent any appeals have been filed, they have been resolved or exhausted. The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los A

, the most recent version of the Complaint in this case, the Motion for Preliminary Approval of this Settlement filed by Plaintiffs' attorneys, and the Court Order granting Preliminary Approval. The Litigation Website also provides a means for class members to make inquiries electronically to the Claims Adminis

il partition action. When determining the equity of the distribution, the court also has broad discretion to consider the case's most salient facts. The Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands further refined the court's discretion to divide property by eliminating marital fault as a factor in dividing the homestead.

rital assets. For that reason, the Court cannot find that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted marital assets in 2011 and 2012, in violation of the Court Order entered on December 23, 2011. For internal use only SDNY_GM_00057230 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R.CON(F IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020054 EFTA_00 16

il partition action. When determining the equity of the distribution, the court also has broad discretion to consider the case's most salient facts. The Supreme Court of the Virgin Islands further refined the court's discretion to divide property by eliminating marital fault as a factor in dividing the homestead.

rital assets. For that reason, the Court cannot find that Mr. Francis excessively spent and wasted marital assets in 2011 and 2012, in violation of the Court Order entered on December 23, 2011. CONCLUSION Based [" 33] on all of the above the Court concludes that both parties individually possess sufficient fi