Epstein Secrets

e 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2011 Page 2 of 12 has been waived. The United States further agrees that, in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, the protections provided to civil mediation proceedings should extend to confidential plea negoti

x: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 (305) 371-06421 Fax (305) 358-2006 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Int

e 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 100 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/27/2011 Page 2 of 12 has been waived. The United States further agrees that, in light of the Supreme Court's guidance on the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, the protections provided to civil mediation proceedings should extend to confidential plea negoti

x: (801) 585-6833 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Jane Doe # 1 and Jane Doe # 2 Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 (305) 371-06421 Fax (305) 358-2006 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Int

iminal prosecutors seeking to force him to plead guilty to criminal charge. Moreover, the cases Epstein relies upon are older cases, decided before the Supreme Court's recent decision in Mohawk. The Mohawk decision makes clear that even as to highly sensitive attorney-client materials, "[a]ppellate courts can reme

ing document was served on July 12, 2013, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. ,ill e• A et• 11 1 1 M ( ( Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg, PC Paul G. Cassell EFTA00209529

picuously chosen to ignore recent controlling caselaw from the Supreme Court, which makes clear that an interlocutory appeal is not permitted. A. The Supreme Court's Recent Decision in Mohawk That Attorney-Client Privilege Rulings are Not Immediately Appealable Limits the Perlman Doctrine to Non-Litigants in a C

e 28, 2013, on the following using the Court's CM/ECF system: Attorneys for the Government Roy Black, Esq. Jackie Perczek, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. 16 EFTA00209615

authority to review a grand jury subpoena for reasonableness. See, e.g., United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 300-01 (1991). While the Supreme •Court has held that grand jury subpoenas are presumed reasonable, that presumption may be overcome and a subpoena quashed where, as here, "there is no re

ents. The Court in In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 454 F.3d 511 (6th Cir. 2006), was called upon to "determine who has the right to 36 Black. Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf 2015. Biscayne Boulevard. Suite 1300 • Miami. Florida 33131 • Phone: 305-371-6421. Fax: 305-358-2006 • www.RoyBlack.com EFTA01713202 conduct a re

rgue that the work-product privilege is unavailable for a number of reasons. (DE 265 at 6, 8, 14-16). The work-product doctrine traces its roots to the Supreme Court's recognition that "it is essential that a lawyer work with a certain r 161 degree of privacy, free from unnecessary intrusion by opposing parties an

einberg, PRO HAC VICE, Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., Boston, MA. For Martin G. Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, Intervenors: Jacqueline Perczek, Black Srebnick Kornspan & Stumpf, Miami, FL; Jay P. Lefkowitz, PRO HAC VICE, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, New York, NY; Martin G. Weinberg, PRO HAC VICE, Martin G. Weinberg, P.C., Boston,