Epstein Secrets

ww.dallasnews.corn/news/politics/2020/10/24/texas-supreme-court-stays-order-blocking-gov-abbotts- mail-ballot-drop-off-limits/> (10/25, 946K) reports the Texas Supreme Court has stayed a lower court's order that had blocked an order by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) "limiting counties to one mail ballot drop-off site. The decisio

Court of Appeals that had upheld a state judge's order blocking Abbott's order. The state had appealed the Third Court of Appeals order." The state Supreme Court "was still reviewing whether to take further action in the case and ordered both sides to file their responses by 5 p.m. Monday." Reuters <https://

s other federal judicial nominees, Judge Amy Coney Barrett "had no problem at her recent confirmation hearing endorsing Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's famous 1954 desegregation decision." Likewise, Barrett also had no issue endorsing Loving v. Virginia, "which 13 years later said states could not

The AP <https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-race-and-ethnicity-alabama-constitutions-racial-injustice- a6c3a6345ff567bf437c6lb6423fd5e0> (10/23, Reeves) reports Alabama voters once more have an opportunity to eliminate "the racist language of Jim Crow from the state's constitution, which was approve

cans outside the US. Texas Supreme Court Stays Order Blocking Abbott's Limit On Ballot Dropoff Sites. The Dallas Morning News (10/25, 946K) reports the Texas Supreme Court has stayed a EFTA00148495 lower court's order that had blocked an order by Gov. Greg Abbott (R) "limiting counties to one mail ballot drop-off si

other federal judicial nominees, Judge Amy Coney Barrett "had no problem at her recent confirmation hearing endorsing Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's famous 1954 desegregation decision." Likewise, Barrett also had no issue endorsing Loving v. Virginia, "which 13 years later said states could not

pressure to reform criminal justice and policing." Alabama Voters Have Chance To Eliminate Racist Language From State Constitution. The AP (10/23, Reeves) reports Alabama voters once more have an opportunity to eliminate "the racist language of Jim Crow from the state's constitution, which was approve

s No Longer A Swing Vote After Barrett's Confirmation To SCOTUS. The Washington Post (5/20, 10.52M) reports in an analysis that the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett "didn't just give conservatives on the court a 6-3 majority; it also means Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. is no longer

for vaccine supply for Americans." Public Health Experts Express New Concern Over Vaccination Gaps Across US. EFTA00149742 The AP (5/20, Binkley, Reeves, Seewer) reports that public health experts are drawing new attention to a new emerging vaccination pattern, which is that the highest vaccination r

s that, "while not the equivalent of criminal a post facto, nevertheless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thorn v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]se

) 172 United States v. Ramnath, 131 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1997) 300 United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2015) 124 United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC) 286 United States v. Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 146 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007

that, "while not the equivalent of criminal ex post facto, nevertheless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]sel

10) 172 United States v. Ramnath, 131 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1997) 300 United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2015) 124 United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC) 286 United States v. Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 146 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007)

that, "while not the equivalent of criminal ex post facto, nevertheless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]sel

10) 172 United States v. Ramnath, 131 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1997) 300 United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2015) 124 United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC) 286 United States v. Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 146 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007)

that, "while not the equivalent of criminal ex post facto, nevertheless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]sel

. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR) 194 United States v. Hester, No., 19 Cr. 324 141 United States v. Israel, 05 Cr. 1039 (CM) 194 United States v. Reeves, et aL, 16 Cr. 372 (VEC) 194 United States v. Serrano, No., 13 Cr. 58 88 United States v. Ulbricht, No., 14 Cr. 68 83 United States v. Vicke

that, "while not the equivalent of criminal ex post facto, nevertheless would run afoul of Landgraf s considerations, and that he "expect[ed] that the Supreme Court's future decisions" would confirm such a reading. Thom v. Ashcroft, 369 F.3d 158, 163 n.6 (2d Cir. 2004) (Calabresi, J., "[s]peaking only for [him]sel

) 172 United States v. Ramnath, 131 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1997) 300 United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2015) 124 United States v. Reeves, et al., 16 Cr. 372 (VEC) 286 United States v. Remington, 208 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953) 146 United States v. Resendiz-Ponce, 549 U.S. 102 (2007