Epstein Secrets

fternoon Headlines 2. US Department of Justice News 3. Federal Law Enforcement Agencies 4. National Security 5. Immigration & Border Security 6. US Supreme Court 7. Judicial Nominees & Appointments 8. Criminal Law 9. Civil Law 10. Civil Rights 11. Antitrust 12. Environment 13. Criminal Justice/Correctio

ouncement clears the way for Trump to add a third judge to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which has been a pipeline for nominees to the Supreme Court. [Continue Reading] See also: Law360 Bloomberg Law: "Judicial Picks for Understaffed California District Advance," Madison Alder, March 05, 2020, 1

never, never would do such a thing," Schumer said on the Senate floor amid calls from Republicans that he apologize for his comments about Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. [...] Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday condemned Schumer's comments, saying in a statement: "Justices know that criticis

• SCOTUS To Take Up Cases Related To Abortion And Immigration. • Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort To Block Release Of Tax Returns To Manhattan DA. • Supreme Court Rejects Election Challenges. • Dominion Voting Systems Sues Lindell For $1.3B. INTERNATIONAL NEWS • WHO's Tedros Urges Rich Nations Not To Hoard V

y 6, 2:00, 4.77M) that Garland "appears to be on his way to Senate confirmation." CBS' Kris Van Cleave: "Nearly five years after being nominated to the US Supreme Court, Merrick Garland finally got his Senate confirmation hearing today for attorney general. ... He'd take over a department beset by low morale and un

ylvania, refusing to take up a months-long dispute over extending the deadline in that state for receiving mail-in ballots." Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "said it deserved the court's attention, even though the number of votes at issue would not call into question Biden's victory

in the events of Jan. 6, 2021, had ruled him ineligible, a decision Trump vigorously appealed. The article noted that the court's deferment came as the U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider a similar 14th Amendment challenge to Trump out of Colorado, with oral arguments scheduled for Feb. 8, emphasizing the significa

01/17, Pengelly). EFTA00160264 The 'Sleeping Giant' Case that Could Upend Jack Smith's Prosecution of Trump Politico (01/17, Wehle) reported that the Supreme Court's decision to hear Joseph W. Fischer v. United States, a case questioning the use of a 2002 law (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) in prosecuting Jan. 6 defendants,

e Reagan era initially praised as a way to reign in overbearing liberal judges. During the oral arguments on Wednesday, it was reported that Justice Neil Gorsuch took the lead in overruling the precedent, Chevron USA v. Natural Resources Defense Council. He added that by allowing agencies to interpret laws, t

es how the president has pushed those protections to the limit — and how they're about to end." Conway writes that the President's "niece's book and the Supreme Court's decision may someday be remembered as the beginning of the end of his institutional protections. And not just in a legal sense. Much of the power of

USA Today (7/9, Wolf, 10.31M) says "the 7-2 decision...written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Trump's two nominees, Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh," sends "the separation of powers dispute back to lower courts for further determination." The Washington Post (7/9, Barnes, 14

.2M) says "the question for the court was whether Congress officially eliminated the Creek Nation reservation when Oklahoma became a state in 1907." Gorsuch wrote, "If Congress wishes to withdraw its promises, it must say so. Unlawful acts, performed long enough and with sufficient vigor, are never enoug

ticle » Podcast Law360's Pro Say: Remembering Justice Stevens John Paul Stevens, a liberal icon who spent more than three decades as a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, died July 16 at the age of 99. On this week's show, Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover breaks down the life and legal legacy of the late justice.

gal service providers, and that trend is expected to continue, according to the results of a survey released Thursday. Read full article » Justice Gorsuch Tells Law Student: Work Hard, Be Kind Since being sworn in as a U.S. Supreme Court justice in 2017, Justice Neil Gorsuch has already penned several

me Court Appears Likely To Uphold ACA Without Individual Mandate. All three broadcast networks and most major national newspapers covered Tuesday's Supreme Court hearing on the Affordable Care Act, with analyses indicating that a majority of justices signaled that the healthcare law would not be found unconst

cated on Tuesday that they would reject attempts by Republicans and the Trump administration to kill the Affordable Care Act," while Justices Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas "seemed poised to vote to strike down the law." Politico (11/10, Luthi, 4.29M) says that "many legal observers believed this c

interests could allow foreign governments to influence hill:L[230][ 911DM Trump called the clause "phony".[2331[229) After Trump's term had ended, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed the cases as moot.(2341 Domestic policy Economy Trump took office at the height of the longest economic expansion in American history,I23

Garland to fill the vacancy left by the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016, arguing that the seat should not be filled in an election year. Gorsuch was confirmed to the seat in 2017 in a mostly party-line vote of 54-45, after Republicans invoked the "nuclear option" (a historic change to Senate

tax returns and other records to the Manhattan district attorney for a criminal investigation, including two appeals by Trump to the United States 4upreme Court, in February 2021 the high court allowed the records to be released to the prosecutor for review by a grand jiwy.010[211] In October 2016, portions

Garland to fill the vacancy left by the death of Antonin Scalia in February 2016, arguing that the seat should not be filled in an election year. Gorsuch was confirmed to the seat in 2017 in a mostly marry-line vote of 54-45, after Republicans invoked the - "nuclear option" (a historic change to Sen

hat the government cannot rush executions in order to evade judicial review of the legality and constitutionality of its new execution procedure." The Supreme Court's order was the latest setback for the administration's drive to reactivate federal executions at the federal prison in Terre Haute, Ind., after a 16-

by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit before the executions are carried out," Justice Samuel Alito wrote, joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. "While we are disappointed with the ruling, we will argue the case on its merits in the D.C. Circuit and, if necessary, the Su

er offers to testify. Inside the Supreme Court Decision That Could Lop Years Off Sentences For Capitol Rioters Newsweek (06/05, Bond) reported that the U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide on Fischer v. United States, a case that could significantly impact the sentences of roughly 350 people charged with obstruction du

ttorney argued that the statute was not intended to cover actions like those on January 6. The article explained that during oral arguments, Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether the statute's application could be too broad, potentially criminalizing actions such as heckling in court or pulling a fire alar