Epstein Secrets

ds. THE COURT: Okay,. Thank you,- Ma'am.- Ms. Boyagian, back to you. MS. BOYAGIAN: Your Honor, I'd like to note that in the Butterworth case in which the Supreme Court limited the application 905.27 by saying that a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE CO

a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE COURT: Say that again, please. MS. BOYAGIAN; In the Supreme Court Case, the Butterworth case', in which the Supreme Court ruled that 905.27 can't restrict a Grand Jury witness from revealing her own testimony, that would

story." As he amassed his wealth, Epstein made enemies in disputes both large and small He sued the man' who in 1990 sold him his multimillion-dollar Palin. Beach home over a dispute about less than $16,000 in furnishings. A former friend claimed Epstein backed out of a promise to reimburse him hundreds

Federal Rule of Criininai Procedure 6(e)(3)(E) do not appear to apply. See, e.g. Carlson v. United°States, $37 F.3d at 763 (7th CJ,T. 201(:,) ("As the Supreine Court put it, Rule 6(e) is 'but deciaratory' of the iong-standing 'principle' that ·'disclosuie' of grand jury materials is 'committed to the discretion o

HE PALM ]JliACH POST, Plaintiff, V. DA VE ARONBERG, as State Attorney of Palm Beach County, Florida; SHARON R. BOCK, as Clerk and Comptroller of Palin Beach County, Florida, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL!CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACHCOrTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50-2019-C

f Justice assigned by the attorney general the responsibility for advancing the legal positions of the United States, including in representations to the U.S. Supreme Court.) The Jaworski filing notes how critical it is to identify the president as one of the criminal accused: "the identification of each co-conspirator -

a "cloud" over the presidency. The notion that reputational harm alone should preclude a normal part of the system of justice seems incompatible with the Supreme Court's decision in Clinton v. Jones, in which the court set such a high bar for any presidential immunity from the normal process of litigation that not a s

t aside the determination of the electorate. People vote for a president, not a vice president. It would be no small matter, for example, to have had Sarah Palin step in for John McCain. If a guilty president is not to be indicted, he or she should in any event be included in the charging instrument as an unin