Epstein Secrets

. Meanor, 442 U.S. 500, 508, 99 S.Ct. 2445, 61 L.Ed2d 80 (1979) (internal quota- tion marks omitted). Our case is not an interlocutory appeal, but the Supreme Court's cases in that field are instructive because they reinforce the narrowness of a defendant's ability to chal- lenge the Government's decision to purs

approved. Even assuming that irreparable harm is a factor that may the Government% authority to proceed with a prosecution, for example, the Su- preme Court has allowed those appeals only in very limited circumstances. For example, the Double if pardy Clause, see U.S. Cont. amend. ("Igor shall any pe

rturn a denial of concurring in part and dissenting in part). such relief. Id. We also keep in mind the In the case before us, the organizations' Supreme Court's admonition that any in- voter education and registration efforts are junction regarding government functions is unquestionably protected from unwar

1688, 1691- 92, 40 LEd.2d 90 (1974) (state executive officials), as are prosecutorial activities that are merely administrative or investiga- tive. Jacobson v. Rose, 592 F2d 515, 524 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 930, 99 S.Ct. 2861, 61 L.Ed.2d 298 (1979). We have previously employed Imbler's

urf Wars, National Law Journal, p. A36 (November 18, 2002) Busing and Desegregation, National Law Journal, p. A24 (October 18, 1999) Lie Detection: The Supreme Court's Polygraph Decision, 70 New York State Bar Journal 34 (1998) Perverting the First Amendment, New York Law Journal, p.2 (January 8, 1998) Prosecutor

District Court for the Southern District of New York (1985-1992) Panel member, Homicide, Felony, and Appellate panels, First Department, New York State Supreme Court (1976-present) Assisted in death penalty litigation with Southern Prisoners Defense Committee, Atlanta, Georgia (1989-90) Supervised law students

Author of Amicus Brief in People v. Angel Mateo, New York State Court of Appeals (February, 2004) Author of Amicus Brief in U.S. Supreme Court in Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992) on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Argued nume

onor of having been selected by the 10 chief justice of the Florida Supremo Court to fulfill II 12 13 14 any responsibilities on behalf of the Supremo Court of Florida? A Yes. The position of chief justice rotates among the justices in the court. And at the time the IS chief justice of the Florida S

It was a little bit bigger. Obviously it was 3 configured differently. Thin isn't a rectangular 4 office. I worked for Marty Fine and Bernie 4 Jacobson in Miami. They didn't have an open door / policy. • So their office was set up in the ➢ane way 9 as Rothstein? 10 Il 12 13 la 15 If 17