Epstein Secrets

ds. THE COURT: Okay,. Thank you,- Ma'am.- Ms. Boyagian, back to you. MS. BOYAGIAN: Your Honor, I'd like to note that in the Butterworth case in which the Supreme Court limited the application 905.27 by saying that a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE CO

a, witness can reveal her Own testimony and prohibiting that they violate the First Amendment -- THE COURT: Say that again, please. MS. BOYAGIAN; In the Supreme Court Case, the Butterworth case', in which the Supreme Court ruled that 905.27 can't restrict a Grand Jury witness from revealing her own testimony, that would

, now in ptivateptactice-ahd representing one ofthe women. The Pilrn Beach Post also will ask Colbath to unseal the agreement. Post attorneyDeanha,Shullman:will atgue,that the,public has aright to know the specifics ofEpsteii;i'.s cleat: According' to ya,rious media accoµnts, Epstein moved in cirdes t

13 — considerably earlier than Republicans wanted — saying the date pres- ents a "fair and adequate" schedule in line with the timeline for past Supreme Court nominees. Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called the Demo- crats tactics "heavy-hand- ed" and urged them to reconsider the schedule. President Obama

. "The frustration is we have no idea why these records were sealed because it seems to have been sealed by a simple agreement of the parties: said Shullman. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Colbath seemed inclined to agree the deal should never have been sealed in the first place. but gave Epstein's lawyers until

RORR: All right. And, also, I don't think the Court -- I think the Court needs to deal with this immliately, expeditiously. VAS is a matter that the Suprema Court hes placed incredible scrutiny over. And the Rule that we are traveling under -- we're not only traveling under a Rule of Judicial administration t

low down a little bit. On behalf of The Post is? MS. SHULLNAN: Deanna Shullnan THE COURT: S-H-U-L -- KS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-X-A-N THE COURT: Me. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Berger, good morning. And Mr. Borger, your client is E -- NR. BERGER: ., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? Nit. EDWARDS: Bred

RGER: All right. And, also, I don't think the Court -- I think the Court needs to deal with this immediately, expeditiously. This is a matter that the supreme court has placed incredible scrutiny over. And the Rule that we art traveling under -- we're not only traveling under a Rule of Judicial Administration t

w down a little bit. On behalf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-V-L -- MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-K-A-N. THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Bra