Epstein Secrets

econd Street, Suite 4200 Miami, FL 33131 Isaac M. Marcushamer Berger Singerman LLP 1450 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1900 Miami, FL 33131 Counsel for Fowler White Burnett,.. Counsel for Liquidating Trustee 209157502 10 LINK & ROCKENBACH, PA CIVIL TRIAL It APPELLATE LAW 1555 Paim Beath Lakes Blvd.. Sure 930 - West

ight years. "[T]he requirements of due process in a civil contempt proceeding are flexible, varying with the circumstances of each case." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 n.11 (11th Cir. 1990). The Intervenors' damages claims are fraught with material factual issues which support allowing the pre-h

,000.00 -9,535.18. 14,125.00 . 33,127.06 9/30/2010 14,125.00 0.00 10/31/2010 33,127.06 0.00 Total billed 157,199.67 -80,000.00 77,199.67 Fowler White Burnett 6/30/2010 - Scott Rothstein 127,166.49 -50,000.00 77,166.49 7/31/2010 - Scott Rothstein 31,068.19 -100,000.00 -68,931.81 8/31/2010 - Scott R

000 00 Execu LLC - Nei1Li i-igstone 25,009 00 Mitch Webber 21,728 00 Lofcourt Black Critton Writ

Edwards, Fixtos & Lehrman, P.L. ("Farmer Jaffe") filed the Motion for Order to Show Cause [D.E. 6326] alleging that the attorneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White") violated this Court's Agreed Order Cancelling Hearing on Motion for Relief front Amended Order [D.E. 10681 and to Compel Jef

be represented by counsel, can introduce evidence rebutting the allegation of contempt and testify on its own behalf." Id. at 1324 (citing Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 767 (11th Cir. 1990)). The Court will refrain from considering criminal contempt, punitive sanctions, or incarceration because of th

amping these thousands of documents [DE 1120], ultimately resulting in an order from this Court that Epstein's counsel— attorneys at the law firm of Fowler White Burnett, P.A. ("Fowler White")—would make a copy of the materials and return them to Fanner Jaffe. Because of Fanner Jaffe's obvious concern that 1 EFTA00

he defendant acted willfully or maliciously in disregarding the injunction, then the court may cite the defendant for criminal contempt." Mercer v. Mitchell, 908 F.2d 763, 769 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing 18 U.S.C. § 401(3) (stating, "[a] court of the United States shall have power to punish by fine or impri

U.S. Department of Justice United Slates Attorney Southern District of Florida R ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITEDSTATES ATTORNEY DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Fowler White Burnett, PA 1395 Brickell Ave, I4th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Sanchez: 99N E 'Sweet Sham. FL i1111 (l05)90-000 Telephone (1

o was then a fourteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex on Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. (9) On or about Mitich 11, 2003, an employee of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN prepared a written telephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's review regarding a telephon