Epstein Secrets

I MR. SCARCER: They wore added by a now list / Joe Ackerman, as I recollect, was representing 2 fi

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

I MR. SCARCER: They wore added by a now list / Joe Ackerman, as I recollect, was representing 2 fi

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

ropriate? I/ A No. IS la 30 Q Do you know Joe Ackerman? No's at the Fowler White Elm. A No.

hree child victims? A No. Q Dld there coma a tine when you learned that Rothstein had used the cases that we have been referring to to attract Ponsi schema investor➢? A I learned that sometime in the beginning of November of 2009 by -- , by reading it in the paper. Q prior to that tine, w