Epstein Secrets

. In May 2006, I met with Si and PBPD Detective Joe in the 4th Floor Conference Room at the U.S. At

e are several emails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz about the appointment of I GAL and the possibility of I restitution trust fund similar to the Boehm case out of Alaska. I obtained the trust fund agreement and spoke with the in Alaska. The trust fund a reement was very complex and required I bank

tation cases was I hot-button issue at the time. The District of Alaska USAO had multi-victim child exploitation case with I wealthy % defendant (Boehm) where they had set u trust fund with I bank and I trustee. With Drew help, I ex lored setting up I similar situation in the Epstein case (Exhibit

ll of our concerns on this matter. I respectfully request that you consider the issues I discuss below in conjunction with the ethics opinion of Mr. Joe I). Whitley that I faxed to your Office on December 7. Background of Negotiations believe it is important for you to be aware of the full scope an

erest in maintaining their privacy; (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; 2 Your letter references U.S I Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund settlement. I asked our prosecutor to contact the AUSA in that case. In that matter

ter handled between Mr. Epstein and the victims' representatives, and that this Office should not act as intermediary. Finally, I would note that in Boehm as well, the victims' identities were not initially disclosed. As the AUSA wrote in that case: "This filing is made ex pane because Boehm, in his p

ent ethics opinions of Judge Herbert J. Stern and Joe D. Whitley" 12/7/2007 Alan Dershwitz Herbert J

e are several emails between myself and Jay Lefkowitz about the appointment of a GAL and the possibility of a restitution trust fund similar to the Boehm case out of Alaska. I obtained the trust fund agreement and spoke with the AUSA in 21 Mandatory restitution under § 3663A requires a conviction for

itation cases was a hot-button issue at the time. The District of Alaska USAO had a multi-victim child exploitation case with a wealthy defendant (Boehm) where they had set up a trust fund with a bank and a trustee. With Drew Oosterbaan's help, I explored setting up a similar situation in the Epstein

iff, ) ) vs. ) ) JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", ) ) Defendant. ) No. A04-003-

penses if the Court finds that such expenses fall within the restitution statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agreed $1.2 million, Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived notice of such motion, which may be filed with the Court ex parte under seal. After 30 days from

AL OF TRUST JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) DOCUMENT a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", ) ) Defendant. ) EFTA00233946

penses if the Court finds that such expenses fall within the restitution statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agreed $1.2 million, Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived notice of such motion, which may be filed with the Court ex pane under seal. After 30 days from

AL OF TRUST JOSEF F. BOEHM, ) DOCUMENT a/k/a "Joe Millionaire", ) ) Defendant. ) Case No. 08-

penses if the Court finds that such expenses fall within the restitution statute. Because any restitution is deducted from the agreed $1.2 million, Boehm, through his attorney Kevin Fitzgerald, has waived notice of such motion, which may be filed with the Court ex pane under seal. After 30 days from